3,850
edits
Talk:Los Angeles International Airport: Difference between revisions
Talk:Los Angeles International Airport (view source)
Revision as of 17:55, 15 February 2010
, 15 February 2010no edit summary
(Possible additions to content) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The more I spot the more I add, anything else needed? Trying to think if there is anything more I/We can add to the page. | The more I spot the more I add, anything else needed? Trying to think if there is anything more I/We can add to the page. | ||
-MK | -MK | ||
* Hi. This is my first post. I suggest the following additions: | * Hi. This is my first post. I suggest the following additions: | ||
::<B>Ongoing Construction</b> | ::<B>Ongoing Construction</b> | ||
| Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
:::LAX ramp control frequencies (I know, I need to add this to [http://www.RadioReference.com RadioReference] too): American Airlines Ramp - 129.32500 Alaska/TBIT Ramp - 130.85000 Delta Ramp - 131.45000 United Airlines RampC6 - 129.40000 United Airlines RampC7 - 129.50000. If you are listing to LAX Ground or Tower frequencies, I recommend that you add these ramp tower frequencies to your scanner to get a complete picture. | :::LAX ramp control frequencies (I know, I need to add this to [http://www.RadioReference.com RadioReference] too): American Airlines Ramp - 129.32500 Alaska/TBIT Ramp - 130.85000 Delta Ramp - 131.45000 United Airlines RampC6 - 129.40000 United Airlines RampC7 - 129.50000. If you are listing to LAX Ground or Tower frequencies, I recommend that you add these ramp tower frequencies to your scanner to get a complete picture. | ||
Does anyone think that this information is worthy of addition to the article? [[User:Streltzer|Streltzer]] 21:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC) | Does anyone think that this information is worthy of addition to the article? [[User:Streltzer|Streltzer]] 21:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:*Sure! Construction can affect where aircraft move around the airport, thus it can be of interest to spotters. The ramp control frequencies are good too; we don't have a space for them in the infobox; you can just add a section to the article about them. -- [[User:David|David]] 17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | |||