Talk:Berlin Tegel Airport: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(Nodescriptive Runway usage)
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Does this sentence in the introduction really make sense ? It should be clear that aircraft always operate into the wind, thus specifying runway usage makes no sense, if there are only parallel runways. Only sense would be to point out in case one of the parallel runways primarily is used for departures only and the other for arrivals only. (Procedures like being in place at LHR or CDG).
Does this sentence in the introduction really make sense ? It should be clear that aircraft always operate into the wind, thus specifying runway usage makes no sense, if there are only parallel runways. Only sense would be to point out in case one of the parallel runways primarily is used for departures only and the other for arrivals only. (Procedures like being in place at LHR or CDG).


If nobody complains, I would like to remove the sentence in question from the article.
If nobody complains, I would like to remove the sentence in question from the article. [[User:Archie02|Archie02]] 09:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
69

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu